Seafarerops
In production on a reefer and dry container trade

From stuffing plan to gate-out, every box accounted for

One record from stuffing plan to gate-out. Plan, movement, sensor reading and damage sit on the same container rather than in four inboxes.

Schedule a demo Read the case study

What was breaking

Stowage, movement, reefer readings and damage reports did not share a system of record. Load, discharge, restow and shift were often backfilled at the end of the voyage. CODECO, COARRI and BAPLIE messages arrived in one inbox; the bay plan lived in another. A temperature excursion could be noticed hours later, unlinked to slot or move. Reconstructing a short or off-temperature box took longer than the claim window comfortably allowed.

In the box

  • Bay plan management with weight distribution, hazmat segregation and reefer slot control
  • Real time movement logging, with no end of voyage backfill
  • Terminal EDI matching on CODECO, COARRI and BAPLIE with immediate exception flags
  • Reefer temperature and humidity against stow position, with excursion alerts
  • Damage and survey records tied to the causing movement, with photographs

What changed for the operator

Impact is stated in operational terms: what stopped happening, what became visible, and what the desk or the Master could do without a link.

Every box has a chain

Plan, movement, sensor and damage sit on one container record instead of four inboxes.

Exceptions in time

EDI mismatches and reefer excursions flag during the call or the passage, not after discharge.

Claims with a file

A short or damaged box comes with stow position, movement log and photographs already attached.

Same line as the schedule

Container state and the rotation board describe the same voyage, not two offices' versions of it.

Offline behaviour. Movements logged on board queue and replay in order, so a call worked through a poor satellite window still produces an accurate chain rather than an end of voyage reconstruction.

Questions we are asked

  • Which EDI messages are supported?

    CODECO, COARRI and BAPLIE, with import and export of bay plans and immediate exception flags where the terminal message and the plan disagree.

  • How are reefer excursions handled?

    Temperature and humidity sit against the container's stow position with alerts on excursion, so the reading is linked to the slot and the move that caused it.

  • Does it help with cargo claims?

    A damaged or short box carries its stow position, movement log and photographs on the same record, which shortens the reconstruction a claim window requires.

Start with a complimentary assessment

A working session against your fleet, flag mix and manning model. We map where you are today, where the record breaks, and what an honest roadmap looks like. No charge, and no obligation to go further.

Schedule a demo How the assessment works

What you leave with

  • A map of where crew, wage and report data currently breaks
  • Which module earns its place first, and why
  • A staged roadmap with a proof of concept scoped to one area
  • An indicative cost envelope before you commit anything

The rest of the stack

Modules share one employee, vessel and voyage record. Take only the lines you need.

Crew recruitment

Application to owner approval on one pipeline

See the product

Crew onboarding

Joining packs, documents and the vessel snapshot

See the product

Crew accounting

Wages, allotments and owner statements that reconcile

See the product

Reporting, online and offline

Noon, voyage, incident and QSMS with store-and-forward

See the product

Ship scheduling

Port rotation, berth windows and plan versus actual

See the product